A follow-up to an entry from three months ago: the New York Times tells us that programs that give laptops to high-school students are failing, because they're ineffective and overly expensive. No further comment; I'll let the article stand by itself.
Update, 9 May: Two excellent and extended commentaries on this:
Both fit right in with James's comment here, and my original thoughts on the matter from the other post.
1 comment:
In other news: "Bag of Hammers Fails To Teach Carpentry."
Post a Comment