Tuesday, January 27, 2009


Good riddance to a bad column

When William Kristol was given a regular column on the New York Times’s op-ed pages, there was a lot of criticism of the decision from us readers. A conservative columnist on a liberal op-ed page? What were they thinking?

But, really, having a conservative column to read isn’t a bad thing. One needs an opposing viewpoint to consider. One needs thoughtful opinions from the other side. I read George Will, sometimes, for example, and I used to enjoy a good William F. Buckley column when he was alive, whether or not I agreed with what he had to say.

No, the galling part was the choice of Mr Kristol, a “Fox News” type of conservative. William Kristol isn’t Michelle Malkin, say, nor Ann Coulter, either of whom would have taken them beyond the brink. But neither is he the sort of columnist I’d expect to find with a contrasting point of view that I’d want to read.

And so I was not surprised when he wasn’t. His columns haven’t been insightful nor entertaining. He hasn’t had anything to say that was worth the print space or the Internet bandwidth to carry it. The experiment was every bit as silly as I thought it’d be.

I am, therefore, happy to see that it’s coming to an end. William Kristol has written his last regular column for the New York Times.

And that last column is as useless as the ones that came before it. He praises Ronald Reagan for putting conservatism back in front of the country. He hopes that Barack Obama will bring in a conservative liberalism that he — Mr Kristol — can live with. Blather, blather, blather.

The Times won’t say what they’ll do about replacing his pen with another conservative one. They’ll only say that they have “some interesting plans.”

That they may. In any case, I won’t miss William Kristol’s column at all.

1 comment:

Dr. Momentum said...

Removing Kristol was as interesting a plan as I require.

G'bye, Mr. Kristol. Rewrite history somewhere else.

I have to say I appreciated his piece about slavery, but not the moralizing part where he tried to drop the problem at the feet of our new president. If we were looking at good economic times, Obama might need opinions from everyone about his agenda. However, there is a ton of cleanup necessary in the shambles we're left with. The regressives have left us with little wiggle room, coming as close as ever to strangling not only the government (as is their professed goal) but also the country itself.

Your advice is no longer needed. Skulk off and let some adults fix the country. Then, perhaps later, they will ask for your advice again.